<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Should There Be A Video Standard For Churches?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/index.php/564/should-there-be-a-video-standard-for-churches/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/index.php/564/should-there-be-a-video-standard-for-churches</link>
	<description>The Collide Magazine Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 15:12:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: A Lutheran, A Methodist, and A Presbyterian Went to a Picnic&#8230;, Or The True Nature of Beauty : Floodgate Productions</title>
		<link>http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/index.php/564/should-there-be-a-video-standard-for-churches/comment-page-1#comment-1470</link>
		<dc:creator>A Lutheran, A Methodist, and A Presbyterian Went to a Picnic&#8230;, Or The True Nature of Beauty : Floodgate Productions</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 21:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/?p=564#comment-1470</guid>
		<description>[...] recent flurry of activity surrounding to Gary&#8217;s piece on Collide about Church Video Standards, prompted me to add my voice to the discussion. There are many beliefs that I hold dear to my heart [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recent flurry of activity surrounding to Gary&#8217;s piece on Collide about Church Video Standards, prompted me to add my voice to the discussion. There are many beliefs that I hold dear to my heart [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brandon</title>
		<link>http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/index.php/564/should-there-be-a-video-standard-for-churches/comment-page-1#comment-1468</link>
		<dc:creator>Brandon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 00:51:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/?p=564#comment-1468</guid>
		<description>At the same time, there are many churches out there that either have no desire to use video or they don&#039;t know how to use it. For these type of churches, just the use of a video is a big step. They don&#039;t know a single thing about quality, nor do they care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>At the same time, there are many churches out there that either have no desire to use video or they don&#8217;t know how to use it. For these type of churches, just the use of a video is a big step. They don&#8217;t know a single thing about quality, nor do they care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Video &#8220;Standard&#8221; Needs a Bit More Thought - ChurchCrunch</title>
		<link>http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/index.php/564/should-there-be-a-video-standard-for-churches/comment-page-1#comment-1467</link>
		<dc:creator>Video &#8220;Standard&#8221; Needs a Bit More Thought - ChurchCrunch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 22:51:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/?p=564#comment-1467</guid>
		<description>[...] Magazine recently posted something about &#8220;Video Standards&#8221; that zoomed into my GooReader and intrigued me enough to read a little [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Magazine recently posted something about &#8220;Video Standards&#8221; that zoomed into my GooReader and intrigued me enough to read a little [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick Rivero</title>
		<link>http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/index.php/564/should-there-be-a-video-standard-for-churches/comment-page-1#comment-1466</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick Rivero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 21:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/?p=564#comment-1466</guid>
		<description>I wholly agree. Video technology has been, and still is, evolving at the speed of light; unless your swimming in it daily, it&#039;s not easy to keep up. I think all aspects of church tech could use a &quot;guide book&quot; of sorts to say, here&#039;s good from bad. But that being said, where do you start? From the DV to RED, SD to HD, &#039;standards&#039; are hardly in existence before there is something new to make you question what was previously a standard. Is this what things like expos, conferences, blogs, and websites are for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wholly agree. Video technology has been, and still is, evolving at the speed of light; unless your swimming in it daily, it&#8217;s not easy to keep up. I think all aspects of church tech could use a &#8220;guide book&#8221; of sorts to say, here&#8217;s good from bad. But that being said, where do you start? From the DV to RED, SD to HD, &#8217;standards&#8217; are hardly in existence before there is something new to make you question what was previously a standard. Is this what things like expos, conferences, blogs, and websites are for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Linne</title>
		<link>http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/index.php/564/should-there-be-a-video-standard-for-churches/comment-page-1#comment-1464</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Linne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jan 2009 20:12:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.collidemagazine.com/blog/?p=564#comment-1464</guid>
		<description>Scott -

I think this is a subject that should definitely be discussed.  Not simply in terms of quality of the content - which will always be subjective - but also in the technical quality.  As in, what should the resolution be; what should the bit rate be?  This is something we&#039;ve been discussing at LifeWay for our downloads (http://blogs.lifeway.com/blog/digitalmedia/2008/11/delivering-hd-content-making-d.html).

Should everything be released in both HD and SD?  Do churches even need HD yet?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scott -</p>
<p>I think this is a subject that should definitely be discussed.  Not simply in terms of quality of the content &#8211; which will always be subjective &#8211; but also in the technical quality.  As in, what should the resolution be; what should the bit rate be?  This is something we&#8217;ve been discussing at LifeWay for our downloads (<a href="http://blogs.lifeway.com/blog/digitalmedia/2008/11/delivering-hd-content-making-d.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.lifeway.com/blog/digitalmedia/2008/11/delivering-hd-content-making-d.html</a>).</p>
<p>Should everything be released in both HD and SD?  Do churches even need HD yet?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
